For a better experience, keep your browser up to date. Check here for latest versions.
May 25, 2023
The Global Indigenous Data Alliance describes Indigenous Peoples' Rights in Data as both data for governance and governance of data. The umbrella term for these rights is often called “Indigenous Data Sovereignty." While these rights are nothing new, they are inherent, the term itself has been growing in popularity since 2016.
In our eBook #DataBack, one way we describe data in Indigenous contexts is by reminding readers that every bit of “information about our lands, cultures, histories, technologies, and peoples in general…” can be shaped into “data." This also includes languages, stories, geographies, cosmologies, demographic information, etc.
Governments, corporations, academics, grant-makers, and funders often collect information about Indigenous people, and peoples, in the form of applications, surveys, interviews, reports, and observations. This is all Indigenous data too.
Remember, Indigenous Data Sovereignty doesn’t just involve data for governance, but also governance of data. This means someone needs to be responsible for collecting, managing, and protecting these data, is that someone you?
Dealing with any data can be difficult, Indigenous data doubly so. But if you don’t know what you’re doing, how can you know what to do about it? So here’s a few opportunities for you to consider:
Some organizations are just beginning to understand Indigenous Data Sovereignty and the very real implications this has for their work while others are at the forefront of asserting these rights.
Indigenous data are collective in nature meaning they are distinct from data associated with an individual who happens to be Indigenous. In other words, personal data rights still exist for Indigenous people just like anyone else, however their indigeneity precludes an association with others meaning their data may as well.
This presents a challenge in determining the line between personal and collective data. It's essential to recognize that an individual's right to their data and Indigenous Peoples' right to their collective data are two separate but interconnected sets of rights. The application of these rights must be determined by the relevant Indigenous legal system - thus the sovereignty aspect of Indigenous data rights. However, after enduring hundreds of years of colonial violence, this is easier said than done.
An example from the world of philanthropy is the need to clearly define how charities will share information with donors, and be clear if the data will be shared with other organizations. Have these exchanges of data been authorized by the Indigenous community or nation you’re working with? What protocols, customs, or laws might you need to understand and undertake to use the information provided to you?
Organizations need to understand that collecting Indigenous knowledge in the form of a survey, study, or part of grant-making does not necessarily mean that Indigenous voices are heard. The opposite may occur if the information they have provided is flattened, aggregated, and understood through colonial perspectives.
Developed by the Global Indigenous Data Alliance, the CARE Principles stand for Collective Benefit, Authority to Control, Responsibility, and Ethics. They provide guidance on how to collect and use Indigenous data in a respectful and ethical manner. The CARE Principles emphasize that the use of Indigenous data should benefit the people the data are related to.
It also highlights the importance of Indigenous Peoples determining how their data are used and ensuring that data collection and use is done responsibly according to the protocols and ethics of the people the data are related to.
Indigenous data are often treated as a commodity or yet another resource that can be extracted from. This results in the further exploitation of Indigenous communities.
Asserting sovereignty requires exhaustive resources and coordination within and among communities and nations. Software that supports Indigenous Data Sovereignty continues this long tradition of resistance, resurgence, and rejuvenation.
As part of our eBook on Indigenous Data Sovereignty we’ve developed a series of prompt questions you and your organization can use around the dinner table, at community events, in election debates, during council meetings and social gatherings and other times when data and stories are shared. It’s called “ 7 lines of inquiry when (re)asserting jurisdiction over Indigenous data” and it’s on page 26.
Download the eBook and find the full “7 lines of inquiry when (re)asserting jurisdiction over Indigenous data.”
Download #DataBack for Free Here
The United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples article 11 holds the right to embrace and rejuvenate cultural traditions and customs, encompassing the preservation, protection, and development of past, present, and future cultural aspects, such as historical sites, artifacts, designs, ceremonies, technologies, and visual and performing arts.
Further, the same article obligates states to offer effective redress, potentially including restitution, in collaboration with Indigenous peoples for cultural, intellectual, religious, and spiritual property taken without proper consent or in breach of their laws, customs, and traditions.
The concept of Indigenous Data Sovereignty can not become a catchphrase. Nor is it inherently positive; sovereignty carries both power and responsibility. This means that no matter where you start it’s imperative we approach Indigenous Data Sovereignty with great care and intention.
We must remain vigilant in our use of language, ensuring we do not inadvertently co-opt the movement or dilute its significance.
May 25, 2023
Our team handpicks Indigenous-focused news articles every week and provides you with a highly curated weekly digest. Plus, you will never miss another Animikii article by staying connected with our News River! One email, every Wednesday. Unsubscribe anytime.